|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2004 - The Tripping Point
-
Dare has a new article on designing XML dialects that are both versionable and extensible, a topic I've spent quite a bit of time on in my own work. Dave Orchard had a similar piece a while back too. Both are worth reading to understand the issues. Both...
-
In response to my post on controlling the angle brackets , I liked Kirk's post about learning WS-* specs . I agree with him that you need to know the architecture and capabilities of the WS-* stack, not all the low-level protocol details (except maybe...
-
Two new comments about my post on avoiding type substitution in XSD arrived in my inbox this morning... First , Mike says he comes from a RelaxNG perspective, and finds the notion of modeling XML schemas in terms of objects bizarre. I'm with you brother...
-
My recent post on types got this comment (possibly a hoax) from someone who thought I was saying that I didn't like XML's lack of OO constructs. In fact, that's what I love about XML. If anything, I wish I could convince more people to stop thinking of...
-
Craig mentioned recently that he would never use the [XmlInclude] attribute because he felt it was impolite to send someone a SOAP message that used the xsi:type attribute. Kevin commented , asking why he felt that way and what toolkits might have a problem...
-
David (no known site) has commented on a couple of my posts about doc/literal/bare. His most recent comment expressed his preference for bare services, but also his concern that it was hard to ensure interop. As I pointed out in this footnote, any doc...
|
|
|
|
|