Twitter or Syndication (RSS or ATOM)

Matt's Musings

Syndication

A friend of mine, Jon Helmberger, posted on this Facebook status the other day a great quote which really pointed out how some people use technology that is trendy, and not necessarily the most appropriate technology.  “If RSS had a cooler name we wouldn't have shenanigans like this...” with the following link: http://tiny.cc/kxALC.  In a nutshell, local Minnesota municipalities are posting information, of varying usefulness, on Twitter and Facebook. 

I realize it must be hard for organizations that are not on the cutting edge of technology to make decisions about what to pick. For that matter, I have been talking to a lot of developers lately who have trouble keeping up with all the technologies, even from a single vendor like Microsoft.  But it is frustrating to see people gravitate to the hot item and try to use it without really figuring out if it is the right technology for the job.  I can’t imagine that with the 140 character limit in Twitter, an organization can convey much useful information.  If the posts always end up linking to something else, how useful is that?  It seems to me that having an RSS feed would be the more appropriate mechanism for conveying this type of information.  There are so many tools for reading RSS / ATOM feeds and including them in a page, etc.  Sure, a Twitter feed can be read as an RSS feed, but again, the micro format seems like an inappropriate means conveying anything other than the simplest bit of information.

We at Pluralsight have started using these technologies (Facebook and Twitter) to convey information about what is happening with classes, content, etc.  Of course we are mostly on the cutting edge of technology and hopefully have some idea of the best way to use these technologies.  However, even we are still learning how best to use these technologies and which information is best suited for each format. 

What do you think, is Twitter an appropriate tool for this sort of thing?  Do enough, or the right, people use it to make it worthwhile?  Or are too many people caught up in the hype?  What tools do you find work best for you to get information? 


Posted Apr 27 2009, 04:17 PM by matt-milner
Filed under:

Comments

Eric wrote re: Twitter or Syndication (RSS or ATOM)
on 04-28-2009 5:57 AM

While Twitter and Facebook may not be the best suited channel for publishing the information (it's hard to say without actually seeing the content), that doesn't necessarily mean it's not the most appropriate.  To be sure, it's a lack of understanding of the different technologies roles and capabilites, but that's not exclusively the responsibility of the organization.  Think of the last questions being addressed to the audience rather than the publisher.  Where is the audience found?  If the greater audience is found on Twitter, Facebook, etc., then I'd say it is an appropriate publishing channel.  Of course it doesn't need to be a one or the other proposition.  

And I do think the public gets caught up in the hype wanting to be a part of the new new thing.  And for publishers, that means following the masses to the new new thing to get the message the largest group possible.

matt-milner wrote re: Twitter or Syndication (RSS or ATOM)
on 04-28-2009 9:03 AM

Eric, I hear you about following the customers, but even though Twitter gets a lot of hype, it is still very much a tool used by technically savvy people.  Now each year the number of technically savvy people grows, but I still see it as a niche technology.  I look at my friend list on Facebook and those folks are online a lot,  but most of them, especially those not in the tech field, have no idea what Twitter is.  

I think the problem, and I didn't state it well, is that the hype often leads companies to think their audience must be using this latest technology when perhaps they are not using it, or certainly not to the degree we are lead to believe.  

Thanks for the feedback!

Ed Ferron wrote re: Twitter or Syndication (RSS or ATOM)
on 05-06-2009 8:14 AM

When you say public do you mean the youth of America?  It is really young people who drive these trends (youtube, myspace, twitter) Facebook is MySpace for conservatives IMO.  Young people are allowed to be trendy and free, by the time the older (or enterprise) crowd catch up and make it do something it was generally never intended to do, there is already another buzz generating.

To the question which is the right technology, if the goal is to go where the people are then of course facebook and twitter are the right platforms.  The trick is making the content relevant for the platforms.  160 character updates about what is going at PS (or insert your org name here), is about marketing more than it is about platform.

Just a thought

Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Remember Me?